A World without Ads
Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 1:36PM The question is, is the city better off without them? The city, in my opinion, in many respects now looks dull and lifeless. I would argue that there is a case for banning the very large billboard style ads perched high in the air blocking views and the sun etc., though as you can see from the Video, when the ad goes, the ugly skeleton of the supporting structure remains. Which is better?
There also are many parallel arguments regarding freedom of speech, choice, lost revenue and lost business, but I don't have enough time to go into them here. I believe a happy median can be achieved and that creative advertising can be entertaining, enlightening and informative.
As an aside, I'm not sure which came first, but Sky Movies created an ad paralleling this new cityscape of Sao Paolo to promote the fact that they have no ads in their movies - but then again, you do have to pay for their movies.
So the choice is there - No ads, but paid for content, or ads and content for free? Would you accept interesting, relevant and targeted content on your mobile for free if it contained a small ad? Or would you like to continue to pay either exorbitant data rates, or "price per clip" to the mobile operators? The debate starts here!
Advertising,
Billboards,
Sao Paolo,
Sky,
YouTube,
world without ads in
Uncategorized 




